Frame issue
The equivalence principle of Relativity abolished any definition of a reference frame. However, we must reconsider this assumption in order to take into account the phenomena of Inertia.
Einstein's most famous explanation consists of two observers: one on a moving train considering one another remained on a station platform. Each of them is considering the other with a same relative speed value. However if the train forcefully brakes, is it the train passenger who is thrown forward or is it the platform's observer who is rejected backward?
Reconsider this experiment by introducing our example: a car running in front of a Buddha statue.
A frame is represented by the running car, another frame by the heavy meditating Buddha linked to the earth. |
|
|
In case of braking, the car is obviously submitted to the inertia, not the buddha. Who does loose its energy and momentum, the car or the Buddha statue? From this point of view it is difficult to still claim that both frames are equivalent. |
According inertia is neither symmetric nor relative when motions are observed from a frame linked to earth; Synergetics has to reconsider the definition of a reference frame for Physics.